Blog Archive

The Pillow Book of Prudence . . . Part Nine

In this last week of July, with only 9 weeks and three days to daylight saving and 36 days to the first day of Spring, one learns that it is a week of observations, inanities and vanities.

One learns that by placing a completely inane statement on a social network about what one should do with one’s day, that one invites the Fates to decide for one.  In the case of myself, the Fates decided I should wear my most favourite shoes.  They are pale turquoise JP Tod’s moccasins with rubber stops on the soles.  Vanity of course, because on that day I liked turquoise.  Today I think it is a heartless colour although better than black.

Read More

My big break!!!!!

I fell down the last two steps of the stair five hours ago and fractured my ankle!

Really . . . I did!

A sunshiny day!

From http://butnotyet.wordpress.com/author/thefondimpossibility

This really brightened a day of writer’s block  . . . from butnotyet.wordpress.com/author/thefondimpossibility and all because I write very occasionally about Richard Armitage’s alter egos in the form of fan-fiction.  She says there’s no sunshine like men who wear black.  To which I might just add . . . leather!

Read More

One in a Thousand?

I’ve noticed a theme in agents’ blogs on the Net recently.  Essentially a gloom and doom scenario which comes down to three points:

1. E-books are going to take over the book world.  Whether published by mainstream of independent houses, or by self or vanity publishers, they are going to rule the reading world.

2. Bricks and mortar bookshops will shrink, or worse, disappear entirely.

3. Slush piles (ie. the mountain of unsolicited manuscripts that all writers send to publishers and agents at some point in their lives) will disappear because writers will e-book publish.

This raises questions in my own mind:

1. Why are e-books going to take over?  From what I have read in the electronic and print media, the biggest percentage of readers still want to own hard copy.

2. Is a writer going to be judged by the way in which their e-book is published? (ie. if it is a free-download which is self-publishing in any other language, POD, mainstream or independent)

3. If (unsolicited) submissions become a thing of the past, does that not mean that aspiring writers (good and bad) have only one means left open to them to get themselves noticed? (ie. self or vanity publishing in either e-book or hard copy format)

4. If unsolicited submissions become a  thing of the past how will agents and publishers find new and exciting writers?

5. The thought of redundancy in many areas also rears its head but I’m loathe to spell it out.

We writers are up against it from the minute we type Chapter One of our opus. Rationally we know that every second person wants to write a book.  We also know that if every one of those people submit, only ONE IN A THOUSAND will make it.

But we write anyway.

And just because one in a thousand is contracted, it doesn’t mean that only that ONE is quality.  There could be 500 of the remaining 999 that are really good reading.  If the quality of submissions to peer review sites like YouWriteOn.com http://www.youwriteon.com is anything to go by, that is certainly the case.

So assuming that writers know the odds are stacked higher daily, you can’t really blame them for being proactive and investigating the options . . . from getting in at the ground floor of retail e-book publication to perhaps POD publishing or similar.

It may be the only way to counter the gloom.

More tools of the trade . . .

A little while ago, I wrote about the tools of my writing life and how few they were.  I mentioned that if we had been talking about embroidery, the whole thing would be different.  For a start, there are my threads, scissors, needles, a fraction only of which I have pictured.

Read More

Gisborne . . .

I washed, mended and folded not just his clothes but all those of the senior household members and at night was so exhausted, I could barely find a bed.  I removed myself as far from others as I could and found a warm corner in a stall in the stables.  I pilfered one of the heavy caparisons and wrapped myself in it for warmth and to protect my body from the scratching straw.  But in truth I was so tired it wouldn’t have mattered if I had slept naked in a field of stubble.

Read More

Ha, ha, ha!

Today is a day of humour.  Writers should never take themselves so seriously that they can’t laugh at the whole craft: from beginning to end.  I only wish (absolutely no disrespect intended) that publishers and agents were similarly represented!

Read More

Yowza . . .

Yesterday, Nathan Bransford (http://blog.nathanbransford.com) quite upset my apple-cart in a blog entitled Buckle Up.  Even the title implied a scary ride into the future.  In quoting a global commentator on the publishing world, the following was pointed out:

Read More

Dear Prudence . . .

“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose


By any other name would smell as sweet.”

So said Juliet in Shakespeare’s tragic romance.  And Anne of Green Gables followed up with:

‘I read in a book once that a rose by any other name would smell as sweet, but I’ve never been able to believe it.  I don’t believe a rose would be as nice if it was called a thistle or a skunk cabbage.’

Read More